Article: Claim: Climate communication needs to be less optimistic, more ‘climate disruption’
Yet another appeal for scientists to be louder and more frightening. The high level of emotional manipulation by the "communicators" is not enough, even more is needed.
Again, why is the truth not enough? Why shout? Why exaggerate? Why lie?
And a new name: global climate disruption. Warming, change, weirding, and now disruption.
Wasn't "catastrophic, anthropogenic global warming" enough?